Climate Change Reframed as a Carbon Cycle Management Challenge

Most people would agree that humans clearly have an impact on the global climate. What people tend to disagree about, however, is the amount of ‘damage’ that we have caused to the atmosphere. There are numerous studies available that offer evidence supporting differing degrees of severity. Regardless of the severity, it is clear that the main issue of climate change is related to CO₂ emissions. If we as humans can develop a way to manage the carbon cycle, it may be possible to thereby manage climate change.

The carbon cycle is a process that has been happening since the beginning of life on earth. Plants absorb carbon dioxide gas from the atmosphere during photosynthetic processes. The plants then either die and return to their carbon state as fossil fuels, or the are eaten by animals. The animals use the plant energy and produce more carbon dioxide gas during respiration. This gas then reenters the atmosphere. When humans discover the fossil fuels, we burn it (most of it) for energy. The burning of fossil fuels produces CO₂ gas. At this point the cycle, the gas will re-enter the atmosphere where only some of it is re-absorbed by plants. We can also choose to sequester some of the gas into deep underground reservoirs.

Humans have the power to affect every part of the carbon cycle. We can choose to destroy or create plants; we can choose to burn more or less fossil fuels. We can choose how much, if any, carbon dioxide we want to sequester into the ground. The decisions we make, the products we buy, and the cars we drive all have a profound effect on the carbon cycle. Managing our choices is precisely carbon cycle management.

It is also good to note that things like the nitrogen cycle, aquatic life, hydrologic cycle, and planetary temperatures are directly affected by the carbon cycle. These, like most things in life, are inter-connected. Changes in the carbon cycle may affect the atmosphere which then affects the hydrologic cycle and so on and so forth. This is why carbon cycle management can be a solution to climate change.

There are many studies available that suggest that climate change would occur even without accounting for changes caused by humans. So why should we be concerned about the carbon cycle? The simple fact is that we do not know how much damage we are really causing. One of the problems with the studies is the lack of tangible and measurable data. Most of our detailed climate records only go back 100 to 200 years. In geologic terms, this is hardly a blink of an eye. However, we also know that the earth has had its share of ice ages and other global events. The evidence lies beneath our feet in the many layers (or strata) of soil. We should care about the carbon cycle because we know that climates can and do change (and not always for good) already on their own. We need to err on the safe side when it comes to managing our impact on the environment.

Attempting to curtail auto emissions, for example, is a much better solution to managing the carbon cycle than forcing everyone to give up their vehicles. There is technology available that gives us the ability to control our emissions without sacrificing too much. Other than emissions controls, rapid reforestation techniques and carbon sequestration (including carbon capture) are the two main management tools available to us.

These solutions can be used to directly influence the amount of carbon dioxide that gets released into the atmosphere. Ultimately, the goal of carbon cycle management would be to literally control our output and make it practically independent of the input (or just reducing our emissions to zero). For now this may be too simplistic to solve the problem of climate change, but we don’t really know for sure until we try it. The reality is, there is no foreseeable way to completely eliminate our carbon footprint at this time. As long as humans live on this planet, we will always have an impact on mother nature's cycles.